Pay Fees Privately
This guide explains how private fee payment works on Aztec and walks through a concrete example. A fully private FPC can pay transaction fees without revealing the payer — it has no public functions, no owner, and no offchain agent. Because the contract is fully private, no onchain deployment transaction is required. Every app just derives the address deterministically from the class hash and a shared salt, and users interact with it privately.
To illustrate the pattern, this guide uses PrivateFPC — a community-built implementation by DeFi Wonderland. You could write your own private FPC following the same design principles.
Prerequisites
-
Connected to a network with an
EmbeddedWalletinstance and funded accounts - Familiarity with fee concepts and Paying Fees
The fee asset is only transferrable within a block to the current sequencer, as it powers the fee abstraction mechanism on Aztec. The asset is not transferable beyond this to ensure credible neutrality between all third party developer made asset portals and to ensure local compliance rules can be followed.
Why a fully private FPC?
The PrivateFeePaymentMethod shipped in @aztec/aztec.js/fee (now deprecated) targets the reference FPC contract, which accepts an arbitrary asset and calls custom token functions (like transfer_to_public) during the setup phase of a transaction. Since Aztec v4.2.0, token functions are no longer in the default public setup allowlist, so that flow is rejected on public networks. See the migration note for details.
A fully private FPC avoids the problem entirely by holding Fee Juice claimed from L1 as an internal private balance and never making cross-contract calls during setup — it only verifies a Fee Juice nullifier exists and deducts from its own private balance, so it passes the allowlist on every network.
How a private FPC works
This section describes the design pattern using Wonderland's PrivateFPC as an example. The contract stores an internal, note-based BalanceSet of Fee Juice per user. There is no constructor, no admin, and no public surface.
Two flows are supported:
- Bridge + mint + pay (recommended steady state):
- On L1, deposit Fee Juice to the
FeeJuicePortal, targeting the FPC's Aztec address as the recipient and using a claimer-bound secret hash. - On L2, call
FeeJuice.claim(...)to emit the Fee Juice nullifier. - Call
PrivateFPC.mint(amount, salt, leaf_index)to convert the bridge claim into private Fee Juice balance inside the FPC, credited to the claimer. - From that point on, every transaction can call
PrivateFPC.pay_fee()to deductmax_gas_costfrom the internal balance and have the FPC set itself as the transaction's fee payer.
- On L1, deposit Fee Juice to the
- Cold-start: First call
FeeJuice.claim(...)so the Fee Juice nullifier lands onchain, then in a follow-up transaction callPrivateFPC.mint_and_pay_fee(amount, salt, leaf_index). The contract verifies the nullifier exists, creditsamount - max_gas_costto the claimer, and pays the fee — useful when the user has no prior balance with the FPC.
Because pay_fee never makes cross-contract calls — it only deducts from the FPC's internal private balance and calls set_as_fee_payer — no custom token calls ever happen during the setup phase.
PrivateFPC.pay_fee() deducts the full max_gas_cost and does not refund unused gas. Use estimateGas (see Estimate mana costs) to right-size your limits.
Share one FPC address across the ecosystem
Privacy on Aztec comes from indistinguishability. When two transactions call the same contract with the same function selector and argument shape, they are indistinguishable to an outside observer. If your app derives its own copy of a private FPC with a unique salt, that copy has its own (tiny) anonymity set. If every app derives the same FPC address and routes fees through it, every private fee payment in the ecosystem looks the same, and they all share a single, much larger privacy set.
This is the whole point of a fully private FPC: because you don't have to deploy it on L2, there is no race to "be the deployer" — the only thing that matters is that everyone agrees on the address.
Recommended salt: 0
Two parties derive the same contract address if and only if they use the same compiled artifact and the same deployment salt. For any fully private FPC, using a common salt maximizes the shared privacy set. The community convention for Wonderland's PrivateFPC is Fr.ZERO.
This is a convention, not a protocol-enforced default. It is up to each developer to pass the salt when registering the contract with their PXE, just as they choose any other deployment parameter. Following the convention means your users' private fee payments join the same privacy set as every other app that follows it.
The PrivateFPC address depends on the compiled contract bytecode. A different Aztec version produces different bytecode and therefore a different address. Sending Fee Juice to the wrong address means unrecoverable loss. Before using a derived address on a given network, verify the network runs the same Aztec version as the Wonderland SDK version you have installed.
Example: pay fees with Wonderland's PrivateFPC
The SDK exports two payment methods (FPCFeePaymentMethod for users who already have a private balance, and PrivateMintAndPayFeePaymentMethod for cold-start) plus a registerPrivateContract helper that registers the FPC with your PXE using the shared salt — no deployment transaction needed.
For installation, the complete bridge-claim-mint-pay flow, required send() options (including additionalScopes and gasSettings), and a runnable end-to-end example, see the SDK README and the integration test.
| Scenario | Status | Execution result | Fee paid? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private revert | DROPPED (not included in block) | — | No |
| Public revert | PROPOSED | REVERTED | Yes (FPC pays) |
| Success | PROPOSED | SUCCESS | Yes (FPC pays) |
Reference implementation
Wonderland's repository ships detailed documentation for this design and its security properties:
- Private FPC Product Requirements — problem statement, requirements matrix, cryptographic design (secret derivation, nullifier reconstruction, double-spend prevention), and security properties
PrivateFPCNoir source — the contract itself, annotated with the full bridge-to-mint-to-pay flowsrc/ts/README.md— SDK reference with every exported class and utility- Integration test
private.test.ts— canonical end-to-end example of the bridge → claim → mint → sponsor flow
Next steps
- Learn about fee concepts in detail
- Review the other fee payment methods available in
aztec.js - Browse Wonderland's
aztec-fee-paymentrepository for the Noir source, TypeScript SDK, and integration examples